Evidence Item - v0.6
Metaphysical unification: becoming, time, and cosmos
E-PROCESS-3
Visual overview: Process Thought And Divine Relation Infographic visual overview
Classification
- Evidence ID
- E-PROCESS-3
- Corpus/version
- v0.6
- Stage
- stage1
- Category
- Metaphysics
- Major category
- Philosophy
- Sub-category
- Necessary Explanation / Process
- BF status
- ready
- Scoring label
- Scored row with active Bayes factors
Navigation
Primary Datum
Datum: process metaphysics offers an integrative account of becoming, time, cosmos, and divine responsiveness.
Scoring / Hypothesis Pressure
| Hypothesis | log10BF | Min | Max | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
H-GOD-IMMUTABLE | -0.03 | -0.08 | 0.02 | A successful process account modestly pressures strict immutability, but classical replies remain live. |
H-GOD-RELATIONAL | 0.05 | 0 | 0.1 | Process metaphysics offers some integrative promise for becoming, time, and divine responsiveness, but this remains architecture-sensitive. |
Dependency / Cap Metadata
- dependency_cluster_id
- cosmological_contingency
- dependency_cluster_role
- sibling_support
- dependency_cluster
- cosmological_contingency
- dependency_role
- sibling_support
- cap_profile
- moderate_semi_independent
- evidence_function
- context_child
- directness
- supporting
Counter-Pressure
- title
- Metaphysical unification: becoming, time, and cosmos is a bounded signal, not a standalone proof.
- text
- The strongest caution is overuse. It does not by itself identify Christianity, and speculative cosmologies must be handled fairly. This row should be read inside its dependency family, not treated as an isolated demonstration of God, Christ, or the final synthesis.
- path
- Start with what the row actually shows, then name what it does not show. Use it to ask what kind of reality makes a coherent cosmos possible, then connect only later to the staged Christ-as-Logos route.
Apologetic Note
- label
- Bounded positive signal
- title
- Metaphysical unification: becoming, time, and cosmos tests whether a worldview can carry the field.
- key point
- Process and relational metaphysics offer an integrative non-classical theology of becoming, time, and divine responsiveness. The philosophical leverage is coherence: whether a worldview can preserve reason, being, value, personhood, and hope without reducing or borrowing them.
- conversation move
- Ask the ledger questions: what does this view explain, what does it defer, what does it reduce, and where does it need borrowed capital to keep speaking?
- caveat
- Treat this as a bounded positive signal: it gives real help to the Christian map while leaving live pressure for the wider case. Do not let philosophy become abstraction detached from Christ. It is upstream support inside the whole map.
Scripture Passage
reference: Psalm 90:2; label: Before time and cosmos, reference: Acts 17:27-28; label: Not far from each one
Caveats / Notes
- Cap notes
- This row belongs to the metaphysical explanation family. It supports root-stage explanatory pressure and should be assessed with related metaphysics rows.
- Cap profile note
- Semi-independent convergence rows are capped, but not treated as exact duplicates.
- Cluster note
- Process/relational cap: this row is architecture-sensitive and should not settle classical-vs-process theology without maintainer review.
Citations
- Griffin, D.R. (2001). Reenchantment without Supernaturalism.
- Suchocki, M. (1982). God, Christ, Church.
- Psalm 90:2
- Acts 17:27-28
Recommended Citation
The Signal Evidence Dataset, "Metaphysical unification: becoming, time, and cosmos," Evidence ID: E-PROCESS-3, Version 0.6. Accessed [access date]. https://logos-signal.org/evidence/E-PROCESS-3/
Machine-Readable Source
This page is generated from the public evidence mirror without recalculating or changing scores.