Evidence item · v0.74
Buddhism — no-self (anattā) and dependent origination (paṭicca-samuppāda)
E-BUD-NOSELF-DEPENDENT-ORIG
Visual overview: Buddhism No Self And Dependent Origination visual overview
Classification
- Evidence ID
- E-BUD-NOSELF-DEPENDENT-ORIG
- Corpus/version
- v0.74
- Stage
- stage3
- Category
- Buddhism
- Major category
- World Religions
- Sub-category
- No-Self / Dependent Origination
- BF status
- ready
- Scoring label
- Scored row with active Bayes factors
Navigation
Primary Datum
Datum: Buddhism explains persons as dependently arisen aggregates rather than permanent, self-existing selves.
Scoring / Hypothesis Pressure
| Hypothesis | log10BF | Min | Max | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
H-BUDDHISM | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.13 | No-self and dependent origination are core Buddhist claims and support that worldview family modestly. |
H-HINDUISM | -0.02 | -0.05 | 0.01 | The doctrine modestly pressures Atman-centered Hindu readings, capped by intra-Hindu diversity and interpretive nuance. |
Dependency / Cap Metadata
- dependency_cluster_id
- buddhism_rival_case
- dependency_cluster_role
- defeater
- dependency_cluster
- buddhism_rival_case
- dependency_role
- defeater
- cap_profile
- rival_pressure
- evidence_function
- defeater
- directness
- supporting
Counter-Pressure
- title
- Buddhism names suffering seriously; Christianity asks what heals the sufferer.
- text
- Buddhism — no-self (anattā) and dependent origination (paṭicca-samuppāda): Buddhism has real force when it talks about craving, suffering, discipline, and compassion. A Christian should not laugh that off. The question is whether the final answer is the loss of self, or the redemption of persons in communion with God.
- path
- Start with respect: Buddhism sees a real wound. Then compare cures. Is our deepest problem attachment, or sin and death? Is hope escape from personhood, or resurrection and healed love? Do not caricature Buddhism as nihilism. The Christian answer should be respectful and clear: Christ saves the person; He does not erase the person.
Apologetic Note
- label
- Comparative rival signal
- title
- Buddhism names suffering seriously; Christianity asks what heals the sufferer.
- key point
- Buddhism — no-self (anattā) and dependent origination (paṭicca-samuppāda): Buddhism has real force when it talks about craving, suffering, discipline, and compassion. A Christian should not laugh that off. The question is whether the final answer is the loss of self, or the redemption of persons in communion with God.
- conversation move
- Start with respect: Buddhism sees a real wound. Then compare cures. Is our deepest problem attachment, or sin and death? Is hope escape from personhood, or resurrection and healed love?
- caveat
- Do not caricature Buddhism as nihilism. The Christian answer should be respectful and clear: Christ saves the person; He does not erase the person.
Caveats / Notes
- Cap notes
- This row preserves rival-worldview pressure for fair comparison. Future cap diagnostics may govern overlap with sibling rival rows, but should not hide the challenge.
- Cap profile note
- Rival and defeater pressure is capped within its own family and kept visible.
- Cluster note
- Buddhism fair-seat cap: supports Buddhist-family coherence only within this doctrine/practice; repeated no-self/dukkha/practice rows are dependent and should not stack freely against other traditions.
Citations
- SN 22.59 (Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta) — five aggregates & not-self
- SN 12 (Nidāna-saṃyutta) — dependent origination cycles
- Mark Siderits, Buddhism as Philosophy
Recommended Citation
The Signal Evidence Dataset, "Buddhism — no-self (anattā) and dependent origination (paṭicca-samuppāda)," Evidence ID: E-BUD-NOSELF-DEPENDENT-ORIG, Version 0.74. Accessed [access date]. https://logos-signal.org/evidence/E-BUD-NOSELF-DEPENDENT-ORIG/
Machine-Readable Source
This page is generated from the public evidence mirror without recalculating or changing scores.