Evidence Item - v0.6
Buddhism — Nāgārjuna on dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda) and emptiness (śūnyatā)
E-BUD-NAGARJUNA
Visual overview: Nagarjuna Teachings On Emptiness And Origination visual overview
Classification
- Evidence ID
- E-BUD-NAGARJUNA
- Corpus/version
- v0.6
- Stage
- stage3
- Category
- Buddhism
- Major category
- World Religions
- Sub-category
- Buddhist Doctrine / Practice
- BF status
- ready
- Scoring label
- Scored row with active Bayes factors
Navigation
Primary Datum
Datum: Madhyamaka Buddhism argues that phenomena arise dependently and are empty of independent, self-existing essence.
Scoring / Hypothesis Pressure
| Hypothesis | log10BF | Min | Max | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
H-BUDDHISM | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.16 | Nagarjuna-style dependent origination and emptiness are central to Buddhist metaphysical coherence. |
H-HINDUISM | -0.02 | -0.05 | 0.01 | No-self/emptiness creates a small pressure against essence-based Hindu metaphysics, capped by Hindu diversity. |
Dependency / Cap Metadata
- dependency_cluster_id
- buddhism_rival_case
- dependency_cluster_role
- defeater
- dependency_cluster
- buddhism_rival_case
- dependency_role
- defeater
- cap_profile
- rival_pressure
- evidence_function
- defeater
- directness
- supporting
Counter-Pressure
- title
- Buddhism names suffering seriously; Christianity asks what heals the sufferer.
- text
- Buddhism — Nāgārjuna on dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda) and emptiness (śūnyatā): Buddhism has real force when it talks about craving, suffering, discipline, and compassion. A Christian should not laugh that off. The question is whether the final answer is the loss of self, or the redemption of persons in communion with God.
- path
- Start with respect: Buddhism sees a real wound. Then compare cures. Is our deepest problem attachment, or sin and death? Is hope escape from personhood, or resurrection and healed love? Do not caricature Buddhism as nihilism. The Christian answer should be respectful and clear: Christ saves the person; He does not erase the person.
Apologetic Note
- label
- Comparative rival signal
- title
- Buddhism names suffering seriously; Christianity asks what heals the sufferer.
- key point
- Buddhism — Nāgārjuna on dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda) and emptiness (śūnyatā): Buddhism has real force when it talks about craving, suffering, discipline, and compassion. A Christian should not laugh that off. The question is whether the final answer is the loss of self, or the redemption of persons in communion with God.
- conversation move
- Start with respect: Buddhism sees a real wound. Then compare cures. Is our deepest problem attachment, or sin and death? Is hope escape from personhood, or resurrection and healed love?
- caveat
- Do not caricature Buddhism as nihilism. The Christian answer should be respectful and clear: Christ saves the person; He does not erase the person.
Caveats / Notes
- Cap notes
- This row preserves rival-worldview pressure for fair comparison. Future cap diagnostics may govern overlap with sibling rival rows, but should not hide the challenge.
- Cap profile note
- Rival and defeater pressure is capped within its own family and kept visible.
- Cluster note
- Buddhism fair-seat cap: supports Buddhist-family coherence only within this doctrine/practice; repeated no-self/dukkha/practice rows are dependent and should not stack freely against other traditions.
Citations
- Nāgārjuna, Mūlamadhyamakakārikā
- Jay L. Garfield, The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way
- Jan Westerhoff, Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka
Recommended Citation
The Signal Evidence Dataset, "Buddhism — Nāgārjuna on dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda) and emptiness (śūnyatā)," Evidence ID: E-BUD-NAGARJUNA, Version 0.6. Accessed [access date]. https://logos-signal.org/evidence/E-BUD-NAGARJUNA/
Machine-Readable Source
This page is generated from the public evidence mirror without recalculating or changing scores.